Article supplied by Sarina Gibbon, Director
Tenancy Advisory Limited
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, arguably the most notable mathematician of our time, eloquently exposes our collective blind spot with the so-called surgeon paradox. It goes like this: imagine you get to pick between two surgeons from the same hospital. One looks like he’s come straight from central casting - silver hair, Savile Row suit, Ivy League diplomas on the wall. The other looks like a butcher: big hands, unpolished, shirt half untucked, eats with his mouth open.
Taleb says you should pick the butcher every time. Because while the first probably became successful (at least in part) because of his appearance, the second definitely succeeded in spite of his. Institutions reward appearances; reality rewards competence.
That same blind spot runs through New Zealand’s rental sector. For decades, we’ve fantasised about the “ideal tenant”: tidy, quiet, no pets, no kids, no mess. The type that looks low-risk on paper. From 1 December 2025, that illusion is going to collide with reality. Tenants will have a presumptive right to keep pets. Landlords can limit that right by attaching reasonable conditions to their consents or rebut that right altogether by relying on reasonable grounds.
The question is whether the property management industry wants to keep looking like good landlords or start acting like them.
Reality Check
The polished surgeon thrives where image buys trust; the butcher thrives by delivering results. Property management has long relied on the appearance of control - rules, clauses and fine print. The pet regulations will test who can actually manage risk rather than perform it.
A tenant with a Labrador might scuff a doorframe but stay for years. The “model couple” might move every twelve months, chasing promotions and cheap rent. Already, we have seen $72.5 million wiped from property values in Q3 this year. Absent strong capital gain, property managers need to recognise that owners will push them to maximise yield for the math to keep mathing. Stability, not optics, is the next performance metric.
Anchoring People to Place
For all the noise, pets aren’t a compliance crisis; they’re an attachment mechanism. Pets are irrational attachments that anchor people to place. When someone can keep the creature they love, the property stops being a waypoint and starts feeling like home. That feeling is sticky. Sticky tenancies are good. Sticky tenancies mean fewer vacancies and more stable income.
It should go without saying that not every pet owner is a dream tenant. If property managers treat compliance as the ceiling of their job, they’ll end up with purely transactional relationships, pet or not pet. However, if they use the pet rules as a competitive advantage, they’ll secure tenants who stay longer, pay more reliably, and treat the property with genuine care. We’re not talking about cat or no cat. We’re talking about management philosophy.
Fear, Leverage, and the Space Between
The pet regulations sit at the intersection of fear and opportunity. Most owners will see only risk, while smart property managers see arbitrage. When competitors panic, the calm operator captures the market they repel. It is not charitable to accept pets; it is strategic. When you know how to signal modernity, empathy and confidence, you gain control over your pricing power.
To put it another way: compliance can be a strategic differentiator or a sunk cost. The choice is behavioural and cerebral, not legal.
Three Moves Before 1 December:
Redefining the Ideal Tenant
The new law isn’t so much about pets as it is about dismantling bias. We’ve long mistaken quiet tenants for good ones and conflate low impact with best outcome. Going forward, the ideal tenant is the one who behaves like a business partner: communicates openly, invests emotionally and values continuity.
Property managers who internalise that will be better positioned to protect yield and deliver measurable value to owners. Those who cling to the “no-pet” reflex will look increasingly anachronistic and unprofitable.
Closing the Loop
The next phase of property management belongs to the realist butchers: professionals who trade polish for performance, who understand that risk managed well becomes return earned.
When the pet rules arrive, some will still be polishing their clauses, mistaking tidy paperwork for control. The smart ones will be checking insurance, re-training their teams, adjusting screening processes, and turning regulation into revenue.
Want more property insights?
Find a glossary of terms here.